Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Avon

---

Wow, look at all the goonanger.
lolz

---

Its rather telling

I'm so irrelevent that any post I make has the goon internet spymaster supreme arriving in under 10 minutes to show his troops the prefered tactic for dealing with rhetorical dissent - almost like he has my name flagged on the GIA echelon/jabber client ...

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Ogodai John

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Avon

---

Wow, look at all the goonanger.
lolz

---

Its rather telling

I'm so irrelevent that any post I make has the goon internet spymaster supreme arriving in under 10 minutes to show his troops the prefered tactic for dealing with rhetorical dissent - almost like he has my name flagged on the GIA echelon/jabber client ...

---

man it's really hard these days getting goons to post on a forum i hear you

---

Yeah but this one is a brain-goon.

He's special.

---

Originally by: Vile rat

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Vile rat

---

I don't understand. Can you please post this in the form of a long winded diatribe that nobody on earth will ever read? Thanks!

---

Sure

If you feel able to comment in the form of a constructive post on the subject then be my guest.

---

Ok sure. Your whole post was complete garbage and you don't even have the basic facts of what occured correct. It doesn't matter how many words you throw around if you can't prove you have even a novice understanding of the circumstances at hand. Also you appear to be an irrelevant lowsec gate camper who seems to be commenting on details concerning sovereignty and its defense.

Posting in threads full of important people discussing important events does not make you important, just a has been trapped in 2005 who pines for simpler days where you could run your mouth off and people would be impressed by big words instead of noticing what a complete fraud you always have been.

---

Originally by: StickyFingerz

---

Originally by: Vile rat

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Vile rat

---

I don't understand. Can you please post this in the form of a long winded diatribe that nobody on earth will ever read? Thanks!

---

Sure

If you feel able to comment in the form of a constructive post on the subject then be my guest.

---

Ok sure. Your whole post was complete garbage and you don't even have the basic facts of what occured correct. It doesn't matter how many words you throw around if you can't prove you have even a novice understanding of the circumstances at hand. Also you appear to be an irrelevant lowsec gate camper who seems to be commenting on details concerning sovereignty and its defense.

Posting in threads full of important people discussing important events does not make you important, just a has been trapped in 2005 who pines for simpler days where you could run your mouth off and people would be impressed by big words instead of noticing what a complete fraud you always have been.

---

wowo, big nasty words; Daddy spell check that for you ?

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Edited by: Jade Constantine on 19/02/2009 18:32:14

Originally by: Vile rat

---

Your entire argument is based off of a false dichotomy to begin with and really shouldn't be taken seriously by anybody. The best you can do is throw around logical fallacies and you should probably stop posting forever.

---

Did you copy and paste that from a wikipedia article on nerd verbiage Vile Rat? I'm not sure you understand this whole internet discussion thing.

Let me explain it to you.

One person has a point of view and expresses an opinion.

Another person has the option of agreeing or disagreeing and if choosing the latter course has something of an obligation to support the demurral with some kind of debate or exposition of their own.

Now, its commonly accepted that if the reply to the initial statement is nothing more than fatuous comedic meme-posting or throwaway snippy digs then its a virtual yielding of the point and nothing more needs to be said.

This in essence is how we do combat in the realm of forum discussions!

In order to "win" you need to do one of the following:

A) convince the person you are arguing with that they are wrong!
B) convince the neutral audience to the discussion that you are right!
C) annoy irritate or fluster your opponent to such a degree that they lose their poise and retire in a shower of blushing tears and imprecations on your lineage and ancestry!

Now, it seems that you are failing quite convincingly on options A+B. Sorry about that old bean but those are breaks, we're not all born with dashing wit and rapier intellect and I guess the swarm is a nice security blanket for those incapable of measuring up to the single combat of intellectual repartee!

So you always have option C to fall back on. It might even work! Many goons have tried and failed of course and the history of such endeavours is littered with shattered virtual egos and slaughtered bees but maybe you'll be the exception and the lucky one this time!

Bravo Sir Bravo!

I can't help but respect the courage of an insect trying to stand up against a deadly threat to the integrity of the swarm on some level - though doomed as your fellows you might yet win some marginal notation in the collective history of your nation.

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos

---

Jade me be talking *******s, but y'all have no right to discredit the theory that without resetting a strong alliance's sov, taking their systems from would be about as far from a picnic as it's possible to get until you've done it. Anything else is mindless posturing. From both sides of this "debate".

---

Been there done it. Didn't enjoy it. Saw the system was broken, decided to do something else until its fixed. Next question.

---

Originally by: Vinata

---

So you lose this round old chap. Thanks for playing. Come again.

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Edited by: Jade Constantine on 20/02/2009 15:23:45

Originally by: Vinata

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

Oh I'm waiting for somebody interesting to post. I don't see any profit in even responding the usual goon lies and nonsense unless it serves the purpose of debate in some way. Remember chaps - I don't view you goons as individuals at all so please don't take offense if I respond to you collectively at times of dramatic moment

---

Aha I can see I need to explain the rules of internet discussions to you chap, for the sake of fair play and good sporting potential.

1. Mindlessly going on about how your opponents are incorrect, without directly addressing why they are incorrect, doesn't work.

Its not an acceptable replacement for actual debate you see. Somebody asks you a question, critiques your reasoning, challenges your assumptions and positions etc etc. It just doesn't fly if you look confused and scared and croak out excuses about your opponent's ignorance like some kind of lame secret code.

You aren't 10 any more Jade. You're a notorious internet brothel owner and if people ask you direct questions you don't get to fall back on spurious nonsense to excuse your ignorance on gameplay or political issues of the day.

So you lose this round old chap. Thanks for playing. Come again.

---

I imagine its conceivable that one day a goon might discover the ability to produce original material.

But its not this day ...

---

Originally by: Vile rat

---

Originally by: Jade Constantine

---

I imagine it must be quite frustrating for those goons that occasionally try to fakepost an attempt at logical entrapment to be submerged in the general morass of hooting and braying and illiterate grunts of their fellows. If nobody ever takes a single thing the swarm says seriously how can you troll pubbies?

There are two boss-creatures in the swarm I might respond to seriously. Nobody else is worthy of being viewed as an individual. If I believed there was much in the way of individual cognizance beneath the moronic behaviour I might have more empathy for the plight of the poor misunderstood intellectual goons but unfortunately I don't.

Parroting the words and terminology of other sentients doesn't buy you a seat at the table of debate. Show the faintest glimmering suggestion of independent thought from below the collective groupthink and this might change - but I won't be holding my breath.

---

Preach on brother! Our cause is righteous and our will to continue is bottomless!

---

Originally by: Vinata

---

Yes, prove me correct. That'll show me.

---